After nearly 4 years, a Court vacates a $700,000 arbitrator sanction against trial counsel CIBC Oppenheimer Corp. v. Friedman, No. B141521 (Cal. App., 2Dist., 2/21/02). Agreement to Arbitrate * Vacatur of Award * State Law, Applicability of * Exceeding Powers * Sanctions (Arbitral) * Breadth of Agreement * State Statutes […]
News
Arbitrators Must Detail Attorney Fee Awards
In Response to Florida Supreme Court Ruling, Attorney Fee Awards Provide Necessary Detail HARE & POLO TRUSTS v. GRUNTAL & CO., LLC, NYSE ID # 2000-008643 (Ft. Lauderdale, 5/17/01): In apparent response to the Moser decision on attorney fees in arbitration, arbitrators have begun stating how they have disposed of […]
NASD Rule 10101 Forces Arbitration Between Two Brokers – From the Securities Law Home Page
]]> Home | Message Board Home Search Arbitration Investors Brokers Finance Law Compliance Archives Dispute Between Two Brokers is Subject to Arbitration, Even Without Written Agreement Court Compels Arbitration Based on NASD Rule 10101 Scott (Relator Zachary C.), In Re, 2003 WL 557009 (Tex. App., 2/27/03). Arbitrability * […]
Does My Arbitration Agreement Cover All Disputes?
Court applies standard analysis to determine coverage of agreement Raspet v. Buck, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 1055 (N.C. App., 11/6/01): Pre-existing agreement to arbitrate does not convert disputes over all future dealings between the parties into arbitrable controversies. Operating individually as investment representatives, plaintiff and defendant created Plan First, LLC, […]
NASD Relocation?
Filings Up, Staffing Increases Proposed, NASD-DR to Relocate? According to representatives of the two forums, new filings are up and are staying up. At the New York Stock Exchange, they surged 41% during 2001 and were especially high in the final quarter of the year. That increased level of activity […]
Dispute Resolution Continued Criticism
NASD-DR Continues to react to criticism of its expertise ranking system NASD-DR continues to react to criticism of its expertise rankings for arbitrators by directing its arbitrators to explain the basis for any claims to expertise. The Neutral List Selection System was designed to operate on a rotational basis, so […]
Can A Defunct Firm Enforce An Arbitration Agreement?
Defunct firms can no longer enforce arbitration agreements Among the initiatives NASD has taken in response to the GAO’s 2000 Report on unpaid Awards is a new rule closing its arbitration forum to defunct members. The new rule, an amendment to NASD Rule 10301, was approved by the SEC in […]
Arbitration Briefs – Procedure Fault is Grounds for Appeal
Failure to Follow Procedure May Be Grounds for Vacatur But only if the moving party preserved its objections during the arbitration process BROOK v. PEAK INTL., No. 01-50339 (5th Cir.., 6/13/02). The underlying arbitration, which Mr. Brook lost, concerned an employment dispute over severance benefits. The Employment Agreement between the […]
Removing a Sitting Arbitrator
Proposals for Removal of Arbitrators Contemplated ARBITRATOR REMOVAL: What do you do when an Arbitrator on your Panel has a clear conflict and all routes to remove him/her have proved fruitless? Under the current SRO Rules (e.g., NYSE Rule 610), the Director of Arbitration may remove an arbitrator based […]
Solomon Smith Barney Reps Lose CAP Request
Archives Whose Money Is It Anyway? Solly Smith Barney Reps Lose CAP Request By Rick Weinberg Several former Salomon Smith Barney brokers seeking the authorization to start a national class action suit against the firms Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP) had their request rejected by a federal judge in Boston, according […]