Court Compels Arbitration in Selling Away Case
Customer is “customer” of broker, therefore he is a customer of the firm?
Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. v. Cooksley, Case No.: CA 02-11137 AO (Fla. Cir. Ct., 15Dist., 11/1/02).
Agreement to Arbitrate * SRO Rules (NASD Rule 10301) * Statutory Definitions (“Customer”) * Arbitration Agreement * Selling Away.
That an investor never had a brokerage account with a broker-dealer does not preclude his being a “customer,” for purposes of the NASD Arbitration Code. Michael Cooksley initiated arbitration before the NASD, alleging that SBS’s broker sold him fraudulent, unsuitable and unregistered promissory notes issued by 21st Century Satellite Communications. At the time, the broker was an “associated person” of SBS, but SBS claims that Mr. Cooksley never had a brokerage account with the firm and never signed an arbitration agreement.
NASD Rules can supply the basis for a contract to arbitrate, even in the absence of a bilateral agreement. Moreover, NASD Rule 10301 requires SBS to arbitrate with any “customer” who demands arbitration. No doubt exists that Mr. Cooksley was a “customer” of the broker, reasons the Court, and “by dealing with Petitioner’s registered representative, Cooksley became a customer of that firm for purposes of NASD arbitration obligations…. Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the Petition to Stay Arbitration is denied and the Motion to Compel Arbitration is granted.” (SLA Ref. No. 2002-44-03)
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to help@sacarbitration.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Mark J. Astarita is a veteran securities attorney representing investors and financial professionals nationwide in securities investigations and arbitrations. Have a question? Email him at mja@sallahlaw.com, call his office at 212-509-6544, or visit The Securities Lawyer
Mark Astarita is a nationally recognized securities attorney, who represents investors, financial professionals and firms in securities litigation, arbitration and regulatory matters, including SEC and FINRA investigations and enforcement proceedings.
He is a partner in the national securities law firm Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC, and the founder of The Securities Law Home Page - SECLaw.com, which was one of the first legal topic sites on the Internet. It went online in 1995 and is updated daily with news, commentary and securities law related links.
