Arbitrator Award Against Supervisors is Insufficient to Bar Bankruptcy Discharge for Fraud
Miller & McGavern, In Re: Owens v. Miller, No. 00-3720 (8th Cir., 1/10/02).
Bankruptcy, Effect of (Nondischargeability) – Rationale of Award – U.S. Statutes Interpreted (Bankr. Code, 11 U.S.C. §523) – Statutory Definitions (Fraud) – 1934 Act (§20(a)).
Actual fraud by supervising parties must be found, and not inferred from the stockbrokers fraudulent acts, in order for an arbitration claim to be nondischargeable in bankruptcy.
Owens, et al., filed a NASD arbitration against Andover Securities, a broker/dealer and against Miller, Chairman of Andover and McGavern, its President. The Arbitrators found for the customers, holding the three Respondents liable for a total of $226,000, plus 9% interest. The Award was confirmed in federal court in January 1998 and Miller and McGavern each filed for bankruptcy later that year. The bankruptcy court did not rely directly upon the Award (NASD ID #94-03867, Albany, 6/30/97), as the Arbitrators made no findings, but it concluded that Andovers broker committed fraud within the meaning of §523(a)(2)(A) and imputed that finding to Messrs. Miller and McGavern as control persons under §20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Circuit Court refuses to discharge the claim in bankruptcy due to a finding of fraud on the part of the broker (Bohling) that is attributable to Miller and McGavern under Section 20(a).
The Court holds that to extend a finding of Section 20(a) liability to a finding of fraud under the Bankruptcy Codes nondischargeability provisions would require congressional, not judicial, intervention. The dissent points out that all parties were adjudged jointly and severally liable and that Bohlings claim would not be dischargeable. (SLC Ref. No. 2002-03-03)
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Mark J. Astarita, Esq. is a securities lawyer who represents investors, financial professionals and firms in litigation, arbitration and regulatory matters across the country. He is a partner in the national securities law firm of Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC and can be reached by email at email@example.com or by phone at 212-509-6544.
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and The Securities Law Blog .
Mark Astarita is a nationally recognized securities attorney, who represents investors, financial professionals and firms in securities litigation, arbitration and regulatory matters, including SEC and FINRA investigations and enforcement proceedings.
He is a partner in the national securities law firm Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC, and the founder of The Securities Law Home Page - SECLaw.com, which was one of the first legal topic sites on the Internet. It went online in 1995 and is updated daily with news, commentary and securities law related links.