Broad Arbitration Agreement Covers All Accounts by Owner

White v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 2844 (Cal. App., 1Dist., 11/30/01)

A broad arbitration provision covering one account of a client may be construed to cover disputes arising in other accounts.

The Whites opened ten brokerage accounts with SSB and subsequently brought suit against SSB with regard to all ten accounts. SSB moved to compel arbitration. However, it failed to produce agreements for two of the accounts. The arbitration clauses in the eight account agreements that were produced were identical, all providing that “all claims or controversies … arising from any account maintained by me with SSB individually or jointly with others in any capacity (or) any transaction involving SSB … shall be determined by arbitration….”

The trial court granted SSB’s motion to compel arbitration of claims arising from the eight accounts that contained arbitration clauses, but denied SSB’s motion with respect to the two accounts for which no agreements were produced.

SSB appeals and the Appellate Court reverses. Noting California’s “friendly” attitude toward arbitration and the fact that the clauses in the eight agreements wee very broad, the Court has “no difficulty” concluding that the arbitration clauses in the eight agreements apply to all controversies between the parties. The fact that two agreements were not produced is of no consequence, because the customers had signed agreements that covered all of their accounts and so no new agreement was necessary to bind the customers to arbitration of claims arising from the two accounts in question.(SLC Ref. No. 2002-01-01)

Keywords – Arbitration, Arbitibility, compel, agreement

Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at

Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.

Mark J. Astarita, Esq. is a securities lawyer who represents investors, financial professionals and firms in litigation, arbitration and regulatory matters across the country. He is a partner in the national securities law firm of Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC and can be reached by email at or by phone at 212-509-6544.

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and The Securities Law Blog .

Securities Attorney at Sallah Astarita & Cox | 212-509-6544 | | Website | + posts

Mark Astarita is a nationally recognized securities attorney, who represents investors, financial professionals and firms in securities litigation, arbitration and regulatory matters, including SEC and FINRA investigations and enforcement proceedings.

He is a partner in the national securities law firm Sallah Astarita & Cox, LLC, and the founder of The Securities Law Home Page -, which was one of the first legal topic sites on the Internet. It went online in 1995 and is updated daily with news, commentary and securities law related links.