“Clearing firms are generally not responsible to customers for the actions of an introducing broker”
Warren v. Tacher, C.A. No. 3:99-CV-806-R (W.D. Ky., 6/2/00):
We mentioned this recent ruling in this well-known arbitration case in last weeks Arbitration Alert (00-26). The Award under challenge in this proceeding constituted the largest punitive damages award in SACs Award Database (NASD ID #97-04772, Louisville, 9/20/99).
Ironically, it was the investor-Claimants who initiated the vacatur proceeding.
As the Court notes, the $15 million punitive damages and $4.7 million compensatory damages awards are unlikely to be collected from the two Kensington Wells principals, Steven Vornea and Salvador Tacher, against whom the Arbitrators ruled. Messrs. Tacher and Vornea are both in bankruptcy proceedings and Tacher has been indicted for fraud. Petitioners seek confirmation of the Award in part, but request vacatur of the Panels dismissal of the claims against KWIs clearing broker, Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.
They claim that the Panel acted in manifest disregard of the law, committed arbitrator misconduct for refusing to hear evidence, and exceeded their powers by dismissing their claims against Bear Stearns prior to discovery and a full-blown evidentiary hearing.
While the Panel clearly refused to hear evidence in dismissing the case against Bear Stearns, the real issue is whether that refusal prejudiced Claimants through the exclusion of material evidence. The Court is skeptical that discovery, if provided, would overcome the panels decision . Clearing firms are generally not responsible to customers for the actions of an introducing broker and do not owe fiduciary duties to the customer, and courts have confirmed pre-hearing dismissals on these grounds.
Copyright 2000-2002 Securities Arbitration Commentator, Inc. P.O. Box 112, Maplewood, NJ 07040; t: 973-761-5880 f: 973-761-1504. Materials denoted with a SAC Reference No. (e.g. SAC Ref. No. 99-01-001) are on hand at SAC and may be obtained by calling the Securities Arbitration Commentator, or by email to email@example.com. The Securities Arbitration Commentator is the leading publication for securities arbitration news and information, and maintains the most complete database of arbitration awards availalble anywhere. For more information regarding their services, visit their website at www.sacarbitration.com
Nothing herein is intended as legal or financial advice. The law is different in different jurisdictions, and the facts of a particular matter can change the application of the law. Please consult an attorney or your financial advisor before acting upon the information contained in this article.
Return to The Securities Law Home Page
Visit Beam & Astarita, LLC, securities arbitration, regulation and litigation attorneys and New York Securities Lawyer
- SEC Charges Stockbroker and Friend with Insider Trading
- SEC Charges Former DWAC Board Member and Others for Insider Trading in DWAC Securities
- SEC Charges Smart Window Manufacturer View Inc. with Failing to Disclose $28 Million Liability
- SEC Charges Former Army Financial Counselor Who Defrauded Gold Star Family Members
- SEC Charges RSE Markets Inc. for Operating an Unregistered Securities Exchange
- SEC Awards Whistleblower More Than $9 Million
- SEC Charges Celsius Network Limited and Founder Alex Mashinsky with Fraud and Unregistered Offer and Sale of Securities
- JPMorgan Chase announces layoffs
- SEC Charges Twice-Convicted Fraudster Eliyahu Weinstein and Five Others with $38 Million Ponzi-Like Scheme to Defraud Investors
- SEC Charges Digital World SPAC for Material Misrepresentations to Investors
- SEC, NASAA, and Wisconsin DFI to host Investor Roundtable in Madison, Wisconsin on July 25
- SEC Names Natasha Vij Greiner and Keith E. Cassidy Interim Acting Co-Directors of the Division of Examinations
- SEC Charges Investor Joseph C. Lewis and Associates with Insider Trading
- SEC Adopts Rules on Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure by Public Companies
- SEC Proposes New Requirements to Address Risks to Investors From Conflicts of Interest Associated With the Use of Predictive Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers