The Securities Law Letter is a monthly email newsletter, containing the latest news, commentary, rule proposals and amendments, as well as press releases and other web based information of interest to those who are interested in the United States Securities Laws. The Securities Law Letter is free, but we need […]
News
U-4 Arbitration Agreement Does Not Supercede Eariler, Broader Agreement
Bailey vs. Chase Securities, Inc., et al, 01-Civ-7222 (AGS), 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7788 (SDNY 5/1/02) Employment Discrimination * ADEA * SRO Rules (NASD Rule 10201) * Consolidation Issues (Bifurcation) * Arbitration Agreement (Form U-4) * Employment Agreement * Competing Agreements * Waiver * Prejudice to Party. The Form U-4 […]
Subpoena Power Not Available for Discovery
Arbitral Supoena Power Does Not Provide for Pre-Hearing Production by Non-Parties Hay Group, Inc. vs. EBS Acquisition Corp., Third Circuit HAY GROUP, INC. v. E.B.S. ACQUISITION CORP., No. 03-1161/1162 (3rd Cir., 3/12/04). In arbitrations subject to the Federal Arbitration Act, arbitral subpoena power does not extend to requiring pre-hearing production […]
Employment exclusion reviewed
Supreme Court and Arbitration – 2002 SUPREME COURT & ARBITRATION: The U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in the Circuit City v. Adams case on Monday, concerning Section 1’s “contract of employment” exclusion. The Ninth Circuit gave a broad reading to the exclusionary provision in the decision below, holding that […]
SEC Approves Injunctive Relief Rule
New Mechanism for Resolution of Raiding Disputes Approved Rule 10335 makes permanent, with some significant modifications, a formal mechanism for the resolution of raiding disputes, under a NASD Rule approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Former Rule 10335, designed as a one-year pilot in 1996 and taken out of […]
Stay of Non Arbitrable Claims is Discretionary
Stay of Non-Arbitrable Claims is Discretionary Where Arbitrable Claims Exist Baggesen vs. American Skandia Life Assurance Corp. Baggesen v. American Skandia Life Assurance Corp. & Securities America, Inc., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23411 (D. Mass, 12/5/02). FAA (§ 3) * Agreement to Arbitrate * Stay of Litigation * Scope of […]
State Laws Aimed At Arbitration Contracts Preempted
State Laws Aimed At Arbitration Contracts Preempted BRADLEY v.HARRIS RESEARCH, INC., No. 00-16021 (9th Cir., 12/28/01): Chem-Dry is a well-known provider of carpet cleaning services and HRI is a Utah corporation that franchises these outlets. HRI granted a Chem-Dry franchise to the Bradleys in 1983 and, in the Franchise Agreement, […]
Use of “Prior Bad Act” Evidence Causes Reversal of Award
Prior NASD Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot Be Used at Trial Markowski v. Attel Bank Intl., Ltd., No. 3D98-3336 (Fla. Dist. Ct., 3Dist., 6/14/00): On appeal from a bench trial, Defendant Markowski challenges the judgment below. In this matter, Attel Bank sought to enforce and collect on a promissory note executed […]
Mistake of Law is Not Disregard of Law
California Court upholds arbitration award Baraban Securities, Inc. v. Viersen & Watts, Case No. CV 00-02931 (WJR) (C.D. Calif., 4/18/00): Baraban alleges manifest disregard of the law in its petition to vacate the underlying NASD Award (NASD ID #97-02538, Portland, OR, 2/23/00), claiming that the claims were encompassed by a […]
Selling Away Claimants can compel arbitration
Vestax Securities Corporation vs. McWood, No. 00-1936 (6th Cir., 2/14/02) Agreement to Arbitrate * Arbitration Agreement (SRO Requirement) * Scope of Agreement * Selling Away * SRO Rules * Statutory Definitions (“Customer”) * SRO Rules (NASD Rule 10301). Investors who purchased securities through a broker-dealer’s agents are “customers,” for purposes […]
